In family law, many people assume
that if parties cannot come to an agreement on their own, their only option is
to resort to litigation. This can be a
daunting prospect. The courtroom is intimidating,
and the processes, paperwork, deadlines and procedural rules involved can be
complicated to navigate.
There is good news though, as parties have more options now than ever before to minimize the need to go to court or opt out of that process entirely. While coming to a full agreement with your former partner is ideal, and sometimes the only assistance needed is to get paperwork drafted to make an agreement binding, obviously that doesn’t work for everyone. Even in high conflict matters, options are available to you.
- Dispute
Resolution Officers
Many jurisdictions encourage resolution prior to going to court. In Alberta one of the programs available to people is called a “DRO”. As part of the court process, if you are making an application for child support in the Court of Queen’s Bench, you are first required to attend with a DRO, or a “Dispute Resolution Officer”. It is a one-hour appointment at the courthouse that is free of charge to you where you and your former partner attend before an experienced family law lawyer in an attempt to resolve the issue of child support. While a court date may be booked, be sure to make use of this session to try to come to an amicable resolution out of court.
2. Mediation
Mediation is available through a
variety of programs. In Alberta, the
courts have a family mediation program through Resolution and Court
Administration Services that is free for parties where one party has a gross
income of less than $40,000 annually.
They can help with issues around parenting, support and property.
Mediation is also available
privately. Many law firms have lawyers
who are specially trained in mediating family law disputes. In such cases, the lawyer would be hired by
both parties to be a neutral third party to try to assist parties in coming to
an amicable resolution. In some cases,
parties may agree to both attend at the mediation without having their own
lawyer, or without those lawyers being present.
In other cases, called “lawyer-assisted mediation”, parties may attend
with the mediator and their lawyers to try and get a resolution.
The rate of resolution during mediated sessions is remarkably high, and while more than one appointment may be necessary, if both parties are committed to the process, resolution can occur without the delays and uncertainty of litigation. The best thing about coming to a mediated resolution is that you had your say in the outcome. If going in front of a judge, you never know what Order you might end up with.
3. Mediation/Arbitration
This is a process that begins with
mediation but has certainty that if the parties are unable to come to a
resolution, a decision will be made.
This process can again be done either with or without lawyers for each
party. Some law firms also have some
lawyers who have additional training in arbitration and can offer their
services as Mediators and Arbitrators.
While arbitration can be done without the mediation phase, typically
mediation is attempted first in the family law context.
Parties would sign a contract
with the third-party Mediator/Arbitrator that would give the Arbitrator the
authority to decide for them if it became necessary. They would essentially replace the role of a
judge in a court process. The Arbitration Act allows for this and the
decision of the Arbitrator is as binding and determinative as a court
ruling. If parties try mediation but are
not successful in resolving their difficulties, the process would move to the “arbitration”
phase. Here they would present all the
evidence necessary and put forth their argument to the Arbitrator. The process, timelines, rules of evidence and
format of the arbitration are all customizable to the parties. Once the process is over, the Arbitrator
would issue a formal Arbitration Award to the parties giving the decision.
Arbitration has many
benefits. It allows parties to refine
the process to meet their needs and does not have the same procedural
requirements that would be encountered in a court process.
While it sometimes seems more
expensive up front because parties must hire an Arbitrator privately, it often
ends up saving money, particularly if the other option is going to court, which
often requires multiple court visits and if a trial is necessary, booking years
in advance due to an overburdened court system.
Please feel free to contact our firm if you have any questions regarding alternative forms of dispute resolution. All our lawyers are well versed in the practices, and we do have a Mediator and Arbitrator on staff as well.
Disclaimer :
Although we are a law firm, this blog post does not
constitute legal advice. It is for informational or entertainment purposes only
and shouldn’t be seen as financial or legal advice of any kind. You should
consult with a lawyer before relying on any of the information contained in
this blog post. We can be contacted at (403) 981 0700 to set up a consultation
with one of our lawyers who can review the specific circumstances of your
matter and provide you with personalised legal advice.